![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEghnlMWiUmCiF3A37IIzonU0LODEFa-Si_F7gQcsJoUvd5GUcbG2C1Q7ccuiSD_oGXGTVJRucQygiqkihDPNLLaP8VGoFfsST167sPe4zpiIcxbyvZeCRLtJYcXbW8TQ2SsGLIEM9ZIUDQ/s400/divgro-strategy.png)
David Van Knapp presented an elegant quality scoring system in this article on high-quality, high yield dividend growth [DG] stocks. The system employs five widely used quality indicators from independent sources and assigns 0-5 points to each quality indicator, for a maximum of 25 points.
I introduced slight modifications to the quality scoring system and presented a way to break ties to allow stocks to be ranked. In this article, I use a slightly modified version of David Van Knapp's quality scoring system to rank the 28 Dividend Kings.
![Image result for king](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/a1/Heraldic_Royal_Crown_of_the_King_of_the_Romans_%281486-c.1700%29.svg/1200px-Heraldic_Royal_Crown_of_the_King_of_the_Romans_%281486-c.1700%29.svg.png)
Dividend Kings have performed quite well when compared to the S&P 500. While tracking the performance of the Dividend Kings suffers from survivorship bias, nevertheless, it is informative to consider historical performance.
Please read this article at Seeking Alpha.
No comments :
Post a Comment
Please don't include links in comments. I will mark such comments as spam and the comment won't be published. To make me aware of your blog or website, comment on my Blogrole page instead.